Monday, October 18, 2010
It's Really About the Condom-ints
In Vermont, Devin McLaughlin sued the local Burger King claiming he bit into a Whopper and found himself chewing on an unwrapped condom.
OK. This story is weird. First - EW! Because I know you all immediately wondered, "Does "unwrapped" mean "used?" Answer: Apparently not.
Second, he CLAIMS he bit into a clean condom that some jerk at BK apparently thought would be funny to put on his burger. So? Admittedly the a$$ who put the condom there (if it happened) should be fired. But, frankly, I'm not sure this even happened.
Third, are there no car accidents and DUI cases in Vermont that some moron lawyer actually agreed to take this case? How was he damaged? He's not he first guy to taste latex. Get over it.
But most importantly, this blog is about the clever comments below the article.
"Maybe next time he should order his burger plain....no condom-ints.............."
"Don't lie you bit into a condom and found a disgusting whopper inside :)"
"Why put a condom in a Whopper? To prevent a Whopper Junior, of course..... Do you want fries with that?"
I thought these were hysterical. LOL
Do you have a clever comment about this rubber maybe burger muncher?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment