Wednesday, October 6, 2010

My Sister Asked Me to Write This


You have probably seen this in the news by now. In rural Obion County Tennessee, the fire department refused to assist a family whose home was burning to the ground because they forgot to pay the $75 annual service fee.

Being outside the city limits, the Cranicks were required to pay a fee of $75 each year to subscribe to fire-fighting services. They forgot. They had a fire. The fire department refused to come help. They lost everything.

This is absurd.

Absurdity No. 1 - No one disputes that he should have paid the fee, not even Cranick. But he offered to pay "whatever it took," to get help. They still refused. Commentator Smirconish suggested that the fire department should have responded and then put a lien on the home for the costs of the fire-fighting services. What a good and rational idea. Instead, they wanted to teach the Cranicks a lesson I guess. Well, lesson learned: In Obion County, Tennessee, principles and fees are more important that people or their homes. What a great lesson.

Absurdity No. 2 - This is what happens when you start privatizing everything. Do you know why we have speed limits? For everyone's safety because some people would drive at top speed everywhere, safety be damned. Know why we have taxes imposed and services provided, so this crap doesn't happen. How much easier - and more rational - would it have been to just assess everyone the $75 every year and then provide fire services to them all? Simple!! So why wasn't it done this way? Because of people's stupid, irrational obsessions with preferring privatizing everything. I call BS on that. It's stupid. As evidenced by the photo above.

Absurdity No. 3 - The Cranicks knew that in past years, people were given fire fighting assistance and allowed to pay the annual service fee the next day. You can see how "forgetting" to pay would be easier when you can simply pay after you need the service. I wonder if the residents of Obion County were given notice that NO fire service would be provided - and no opportunity to pay the fee after the due date - if the fee was not timely paid. Shouldn't people know the consequences of their acts and omissions prior to taking a step forward? They already had an expectation that they could get help if they needed. Were they informed of the change? It seems not. (For more details about what the Cranicks experienced, google the video interviews of Mr. Cranick with Keith Olbermann.

Absurdity No. 4 - This is what happens when people put "being right" ahead of "doing the right thing." Of course, they didn't pay the fee, so the fire department was "right" that they had no obligation to help the Cranicks. But does anyone dispute that ignoring their neighbor's cry for help was NOT the "right thing to do?" As adults, we (hopefully) learn the difference and try to put aside our egos and do the right thing. I wish, for the sake of the Cranicks, that the Obion County fire department had been able to act like adults.

The Cranicks lost everything: 3 dogs, a cat, all of their clothes and belongings. Everything. Is that the proper consequence for forgetting to pay a $75 fee?

Oh, and if the loss of everything was not enough, Mr. Cranick gets mocked on Glenn Beck's radio show here.

Good Mormon Glenn Beck mocks compassion (while his co-host mocks all southerners) and argues that it's all about the $75. He must think we're stupid. There are more alternatives than voluntarily paying to get protection OR not paying and getting no protection. (1) Assess the fee to everyone and everyone gets fire service. (2) Save the house and place a lien on the house for the cost, or the fee. (3) Save the house and then sue the guy for the money. I could go on, but you get it. With all of these reasonable scenarios, the house gets saved and Cranick is held responsible. It is not either/or!

Moreover, Beck makes some weird parallel to "Obama Care" claiming that "Obama Care" is like putting out the fire without requiring the fee. Well, now he's not just being stupid, he's outright lying. The Health Care Reform law requires everyone (or almost everyone) to purchase health insurance. That's the fee. Indeed, the mandate forces personal responsibility where none was required before.

If the service fee in Obion County had been mandated, I would not be writing this particular blog and Mr. Cranick would likely still have a home, 3 dogs, and a cat.

So you tell me: What world do you want to live in? The one where everything is privatized and people risk losing everything with a small omission? Or the one where there are safety nets for people (which are paid for by assessments and taxes)? And be honest. If you have ever relied on the police, fire department, FEMA, or the VA, or if you have ever benefited from Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Disability or WIC, you know that government safety nets can literally save lives. And it can be done in a way to requires personal responsibility.

6 comments:

  1. What I find even more dastardly than the fact that the South Fulton firefighters (who actually responded to the 911 call and appeared on the scene) not only refused to help Mr Cranick save his home, they acted to prevent his next-door neighbours' homes from catching fire! WTH, people?!?!

    This man, *if* he had a fire insurance policy on his home, stands a great risk of not being covered for this incident, since it will doubtless come to light that (officially) he did not have fire department service secured for his home at the time of the blaze. And this, if I'm not mistaken, is typically a crucial term for fire insurance on a structure such as a home.

    I really believe that this man has grounds to sue the city of South Fulton and the mayor for this grotesque and wanton negligence which resulted in the loss of his home. Whatever happened to the notion of being required to render aid? If someone had been trapped in that house, would any of the firefighters have braved the flames to attempt a rescue?

    I'm sorry, I typically hold police and firefighters up as pillars of the community, but these guys were nothing more than a herd of callous and spineless drones who were obviously unable to think for themselves enough to consider that allowing a man's home to burn to the ground over a measely seventy-five dollars might be taking legalistic thinking a bit too far.

    And Glenn Beck can just go run into the next burning building in his town, as far as I'm concerned. It will get him where he's bound a whole helluva lot sooner. What a shameless and sorry excuse for a waste of skin he is showing himself to be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. David,

    His policy actually does have the exclusion you reference. Fortunately, the insurance company has already stated publicly that it will honor and pay the policy anyway because it is such a high profile situation.

    When insurance companies show more humanity than the local firefighters, we may have hit the actual bottom.

    Thanks for the thoughtful comment!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder Heather: why did you fail to identify the religious persuasions of all persons mentioned in this article? Were they baptist? Jews? Atheists? Clearly you felt that identifying Glenn Beck as a Mormon had some relevance. You of all people should know that that is fallacious argumentation and only serves to imply that his religion is the cause of his bigotry and insensitivity. If this is what you mean, then leave Glenn Beck out of it and paint with the broader brush.

    You personally know many Mormons who are kind and sensitive people who agree with the spirit of your posting. And you also know that Glenn Beck is insensitive because he is Glenn Beck, not because he is a Mormon.

    Fight fair.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post! I was so irritated about this story--thanks for writing about it. It just galls me to no end. THOSE ANIMALS BURNED TO DEATH!! How horrible!!! =( And, yes, this is what happens to society when you start privatizing everything.... Utter disaster.

    The fire chief that was interviewed said they (fire fighters) don't like this system because they WANT to help, they HATE standing by watching a house burn to the ground. It goes against everything a fire-fighter stands for. I think that's a good point. Shouldn't the firemen have some say?

    Mental Vacuum, Beck claims to be religious but acts in a way that is completely unChristian so, yea, I think it's relevant to point out that he's LDS. It's relevant because it defines his hypocrisy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mental Vacuum,

    Yes, I do know many Mormons that exhibit those good traits you described (including you), just as I know Protestants, Catholics, Jews, and atheists who do too. I think my blog clearly singles Beck out and is not an attack on all Mormons.

    My reference to his faith was merely to illustrate the hypocrisy of his mocking, cruel argument in juxtaposition to his claimed faith. It was certainly not my intention to imply that all Mormons would agree with him, since that is not my opinion at all, and I don't think it reads that way.

    I guess it would have offended you less if I had called him a "Christian" instead of IDing him as he IDs himself.

    While I did not set out to intentionally offend you or any other LDS church member, I will not obfuscate and pretend Glen Beck is not a member of that church. If that bothers you, take it up with your church leaders who permit him to remain a member in good standing while he pollutse our airwaves with deception, hate, and divisiveness.

    It's not my fault he's a member of your faith any more than it is yours. But he is.

    And I could ask you and your fellow members to "fight fair." Why doesn't anyone from your faith come out and condemn his hate-speech, his lying, his race-baiting, his very (IMO) un-Christ-like behavior?

    You want to protect the word "Mormon" from me but not from Beck? He's more of a threat to your church that I am.

    Ok. Done now.

    Also, Hi Dave.

    Have a good weekend. :-D

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'll be honest and say I don't know enough about this situation to formulate an educated opinion. I'll do some more reading on it. Let me just say one thing as to Glenn Beck: yes, he is a Mormon, but he by no means speaks for Mormons as a whole. His opinions are simply that - opinions. As a Mormon myself, I happen to like Beck most of the time, but I can honestly say it has nothing to do with Mormonism. In fact, that's something I wish he would leave completely alone. I don't like when he brings it into his radio and/or television show (which I don't watch, btw). There's a time and a place for things like that, and in my opinion, talk radio is not the place. On the other hand, it is HIS show and I guess under the First Amendment he has the right to discuss what HE chooses. Please don't think that he speaks for all of us, because I assure you, he certainly doesn't represent me and many Mormons that I know. As far as members from our faith coming out and condemning much of his behavior, thoughts and speech - believe me, I have heard EXTENSIVE criticism of him from many within my faith, and many that hold high positions in the church. Anyway, there really are those of us out there. Promise. :)

    ReplyDelete